Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Liam Sturgess's avatar

Hugely helpful. I'm just about to dig into this deeper, and your timing couldn't be better. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Vivien C Buckley's avatar

I figured the courts were involved in pushing the one sided narrative. I think it was in 2022 that two family court justices got their reputations smeared and excoriated by the appeals court and the Toronto star for ruling on the side in two different cases where feuding parents were arguing over their kids getting the shots. The judges sided with the parent who did not want their kids getting the shot. Justice Pazaratz in Hamilton and Justice Bennett in North York. Justice Pazaratz said he didn’t have enough evidence in front of him to rule in favour of getting the shots. Which was the absolute truth. I was shocked at the Toronto star weighing in on something they knew nothing about which was the reason I stopped my subscription. When the virus first came to our shores everybody was scrambling and wanted this life saving shot. Pharma held countries over the barrel, I wonder what was contained in the contracts with pharma. The influence of pharma was far and wide. The smearing of people’s reputations who dared question the shot or downright warned against it is a move right out of pharma’s playbook.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts