PHAC has complied with Information Commissioner's order to release dozens of documents, revealing comprehensive awareness of death and misery caused by covid vaccines
Thanks very much for sharing. I just skimmed the main OCR document.
The fact that Health Canada documents reveal they knew Endotoxin increased mortality, specifically caused by Cytokine Storm and Acute Kidney Injury with Multiple Organ Failure, might be useful in Legal Cases.
2 useful papers they refer to are:
Qian et al 2022. Early Renal-Replacement Therapy May Reduce the All-Cause Mortality of Severe COVID-19: An Observational Cohort Study
Antunes et al 2023. COVID-19 inactivated and non-replicating viral vector vaccines induce regulatory training phenotype in human monocytes under epigenetic control.
Their thoughts and actions emanate from a deeply ingrained sub contextual set of assumptions that is flawed. They are likely unaware of their bias. They are incapable of recognizing or acknowledging the defect in their assumptions because it integral to the foundation upon which they've built their life's work. Add to that they appear to be lazy and perhaps cavalier in their work ethic. That's my rose colored glasses interpretation.
Alternatively they are evil and really don't give a damn.
The amount of information here could fill a book. I haven’t read it all but will over time. Often I get so down as the truth about these shots gets buried in ineptitude, propaganda and skewed statistics. I’m shot injured and the whole discrediting of real scientists and the truth is just an added weight on an already over burdened nervous system.
Aspiration pneumonitis is an acute chemical lung injury caused by aspiration or inhalation of STERILE acidic GI content. Only 25% progress to pneumonia and that takes quite a few days or weeks. This patient died of aspiration pneumonitis secondary to her seizures. She didn't live long enough to have pneumonia.
Also possible her olanzapine may have been increased with an interaction with the vaccine, leading to increase QT interval, arrythmia, hypoxia, seizures.
Jeez Dr. Pain, I can't say what happens anywhere else, but in our little ED Zofran ODT is given out like candy. The only
time I have seen providers hesitate to order it is in cases where they have an EKG that documents existing Q-T prolongation. Pregnant women and infants are given the stuff with a presumption of safety.
what scares me is that many people who are unjabbed may also be dealing with issues through shedding, especially as these so-called self-amplifying mRNA vaccines are pushed through approval
1. Dr Ryan cole looked in a microscope and told you all what they were made of 4 years ago.
The entire lot of you , didn't bother learning. He even told you "amyloid" way back then
2. Dr bhakdi told you what triggers them, 4 years ago.
The whole lot of you.
Completely ignored him.
3. The died suddenly documentary came out 3 years ago on clots. It didn't say what they were made of. Not one person asked: "but what are they made of?"
yea I remember cole and bhakdi's early warnings, bhakdi basically said the jabs would increase ALL diseases because the 'spikeopathy' led to chronic, systemic inflammation and amyloidosis. Amyloidosis has been known for a very long time. Many people are just catching up though, so I try to present it in a way that catches their attention - that said, I'm still astonished it's creating the level of stuff we're seeing!
From: Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg, October 1946–April 1949. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O, 1949–1953.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt, et al. 1947, AKA 'The Doctors' Trial', Justice Walter B. Beals (presiding):
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us is to the effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
When fear rages thanks to propaganda, it clouds and cripples decision making, leaving inaction despite the obvious linkage to Covid vaccine injuries. It’s just sad - and negligent.
The NO ACTION TAKEN even though the evidence clearly pointed to injury and death from an injection is a premeditated decision by PHAC to allow death and injury to occur. That is a crime against the population of Canada.
Hello. Do you have the "internal critical appraisal" of our article "carried out by VSSD (please find attached)"? I would love to get it: denis.rancourt@gmail.com
Thanks very much for sharing. I just skimmed the main OCR document.
The fact that Health Canada documents reveal they knew Endotoxin increased mortality, specifically caused by Cytokine Storm and Acute Kidney Injury with Multiple Organ Failure, might be useful in Legal Cases.
2 useful papers they refer to are:
Qian et al 2022. Early Renal-Replacement Therapy May Reduce the All-Cause Mortality of Severe COVID-19: An Observational Cohort Study
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9148880/
and
Antunes et al 2023. COVID-19 inactivated and non-replicating viral vector vaccines induce regulatory training phenotype in human monocytes under epigenetic control.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1200789/full
The authors of the latter paper operate under some erroneous assumptions.
PHAC believes it’s own lies
Their thoughts and actions emanate from a deeply ingrained sub contextual set of assumptions that is flawed. They are likely unaware of their bias. They are incapable of recognizing or acknowledging the defect in their assumptions because it integral to the foundation upon which they've built their life's work. Add to that they appear to be lazy and perhaps cavalier in their work ethic. That's my rose colored glasses interpretation.
Alternatively they are evil and really don't give a damn.
The amount of information here could fill a book. I haven’t read it all but will over time. Often I get so down as the truth about these shots gets buried in ineptitude, propaganda and skewed statistics. I’m shot injured and the whole discrediting of real scientists and the truth is just an added weight on an already over burdened nervous system.
Page 1466
Aspiration pneumonitis is an acute chemical lung injury caused by aspiration or inhalation of STERILE acidic GI content. Only 25% progress to pneumonia and that takes quite a few days or weeks. This patient died of aspiration pneumonitis secondary to her seizures. She didn't live long enough to have pneumonia.
Also possible her olanzapine may have been increased with an interaction with the vaccine, leading to increase QT interval, arrythmia, hypoxia, seizures.
The lady who died as described on page 730 might well have been killed by Zofran treatment
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/zofran-ondansetron-update-on-thousands
Jeez Dr. Pain, I can't say what happens anywhere else, but in our little ED Zofran ODT is given out like candy. The only
time I have seen providers hesitate to order it is in cases where they have an EKG that documents existing Q-T prolongation. Pregnant women and infants are given the stuff with a presumption of safety.
Thanks for the link.
Can you PHAC-ing believe this? Murder and lies....
Well, apparently Rancourt et al's report (inside a cursory analysis trying to debunk it) was sent to the police, among others...
(page 471)
"Cleaned dataset" - Hana Ogasawara, Page 1473, on Infant murders caused by the shots
Cleaned of the truth.
I believe the most telling comment is on page 1524, "How much under reporting is there?"
Thank you for compiling this and giving such a thorough review. Absolutely criminal that they’re still pushing these
Thank you, hopefully all the c19 v-programs are shutdown worldwide inside this year 2025
what scares me is that many people who are unjabbed may also be dealing with issues through shedding, especially as these so-called self-amplifying mRNA vaccines are pushed through approval
merely consider the case of those freakish calamari-like clots coming from people. Those who have analyzed them are calling them a never-before-seen 'blood-borne systemic amyloidosis'... https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/weve-identified-a-new-blood-borne?r=8ypo0
What scares me is you all still calling them "freakish mystery white fiberous clots" for 4 years now.
Oh sorry.
You got a new word now. "Amyloid".
Still irrelevant.
Keep trying though
Your all doing great.
for all I know they could be hybrid alien parasites or self-assembling nanotentacles
Let me ask you this.
What NORMALLY triggers blood to clot.?
Like basic anatomy reason.
Perhaps if after four years and you still don't know, like everyone else. You should accept here is clearly something very very wrong?
I've known for 4 years.
I'm normal.
I don't know where you're going with this, so why don't you take just a moment to enlighten us all?
Ok.
1. Dr Ryan cole looked in a microscope and told you all what they were made of 4 years ago.
The entire lot of you , didn't bother learning. He even told you "amyloid" way back then
2. Dr bhakdi told you what triggers them, 4 years ago.
The whole lot of you.
Completely ignored him.
3. The died suddenly documentary came out 3 years ago on clots. It didn't say what they were made of. Not one person asked: "but what are they made of?"
See the problem?
Try...learning. the answers.
That. Might. Work.
Humans.
yea I remember cole and bhakdi's early warnings, bhakdi basically said the jabs would increase ALL diseases because the 'spikeopathy' led to chronic, systemic inflammation and amyloidosis. Amyloidosis has been known for a very long time. Many people are just catching up though, so I try to present it in a way that catches their attention - that said, I'm still astonished it's creating the level of stuff we're seeing!
The crime is the discrepancy between what they knew and what they said. Nuremberg code applies to such behavior. “Live not by Lies”
Re Nuremberg Code
From: Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg, October 1946–April 1949. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O, 1949–1953.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt, et al. 1947, AKA 'The Doctors' Trial', Justice Walter B. Beals (presiding):
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us is to the effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
It's a crime on top of a crime on. Top of an unexplainable crime until you get to he logical conclusion..
Supernatural ultimate evil attack on humanity turning everywhere demonic.
Obviously.
Or.
Gods wrath.
Cos that's clearly what's happening.
Anyway.
Good luck everyone.
Chose wisely.
When fear rages thanks to propaganda, it clouds and cripples decision making, leaving inaction despite the obvious linkage to Covid vaccine injuries. It’s just sad - and negligent.
The NO ACTION TAKEN even though the evidence clearly pointed to injury and death from an injection is a premeditated decision by PHAC to allow death and injury to occur. That is a crime against the population of Canada.
Did they also keep a history of persons who emailed warnings and alternative treatments early on : )
https://oliverennis.substack.com/p/sick-silence-ignore-censor-kill?r=5eo0n8
Hello. Do you have the "internal critical appraisal" of our article "carried out by VSSD (please find attached)"? I would love to get it: denis.rancourt@gmail.com
Unbelievable!